<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows is so irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:20:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligiu Uiorean</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligiu Uiorean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Dear Dani, 

While the article is meant to be as a thought experiment let&#039;s explore the concept a bit further:

Users are familiar with a particular interface, not the OS per se. As more and more applications are going to be web based the future corporate appliance will be some kind o secure environment with a very fast web browser. My feeling is that it will not be a windows machine unless microsoft really changes the pricing and security model of the product.

They way you are putting the problem I think that windows will still be the dominant HOME operating system but the future corporation will be quick to switch as soon as the business applications will support that.

Given the trend in virtualization it might just be that we will stop running one operating system, maybe applications will come with a pre-packaged OS or at least a hardware abstraction layer and will run concurrently on the same platform, irrespective of the actual platform.

I am still forming the image in this area nut refer to my previous article (the future is cloudy and open) for a few more thought.

Thank you for your comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dani, </p>
<p>While the article is meant to be as a thought experiment let&#8217;s explore the concept a bit further:</p>
<p>Users are familiar with a particular interface, not the OS per se. As more and more applications are going to be web based the future corporate appliance will be some kind o secure environment with a very fast web browser. My feeling is that it will not be a windows machine unless microsoft really changes the pricing and security model of the product.</p>
<p>They way you are putting the problem I think that windows will still be the dominant HOME operating system but the future corporation will be quick to switch as soon as the business applications will support that.</p>
<p>Given the trend in virtualization it might just be that we will stop running one operating system, maybe applications will come with a pre-packaged OS or at least a hardware abstraction layer and will run concurrently on the same platform, irrespective of the actual platform.</p>
<p>I am still forming the image in this area nut refer to my previous article (the future is cloudy and open) for a few more thought.</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I am not a MS fan, but we all have to admit that in a large corporation, 99% of the desktop machines are running Windows. Most of the employees are not IT/SW engineers and they are not familiar with Unix, so I think MS still has a lot of power starting from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a MS fan, but we all have to admit that in a large corporation, 99% of the desktop machines are running Windows. Most of the employees are not IT/SW engineers and they are not familiar with Unix, so I think MS still has a lot of power starting from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Butterfly effect » Windows is so irrelevant -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Butterfly effect » Windows is so irrelevant -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Web Startup Group, hrjn_rss, Christos Delivorias, YC Hacker News, hkrnws and others. hkrnws said: Windows is so irrelevant http://bit.ly/dgqPd6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Web Startup Group, hrjn_rss, Christos Delivorias, YC Hacker News, hkrnws and others. hkrnws said: Windows is so irrelevant <a href="http://bit.ly/dgqPd6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dgqPd6</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-61</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by webstartupgroup: StartupNews: Windows is so irrelevant http://bit.ly/9ZD9fC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by webstartupgroup: StartupNews: Windows is so irrelevant <a href="http://bit.ly/9ZD9fC.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9ZD9fC..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lk</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>lk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-55</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-53&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kombinat &lt;/a&gt; : Have you checked www.sun.com lately ? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-53" rel="nofollow">@Kombinat </a> : Have you checked <a href="http://www.sun.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com</a> lately ? <img src='http://uiorean.ro/world/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kombinat</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Kombinat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Why no mention of Sun?

I think they can cover every single aspect of what your asking, including desktop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why no mention of Sun?</p>
<p>I think they can cover every single aspect of what your asking, including desktop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Reilly</title>
		<link>http://uiorean.ro/world/2010/01/windows-is-so-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uiorean.ro/world/?p=342#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Just one point of clarification : \I will choose Xen, an ex-free solution now embraced by Citrix (becoming free again)\ - Xen has always been \free\. It lived on, post-Citrix&#039; acquisition of XenSource through the Xen.org guys (to which Citrix continued to contribute). XenServer, the Citrix product, is free today - as in no cost. The cost is incurred when the option packs and support (known as Essentials) are purchased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Just one point of clarification : \I will choose Xen, an ex-free solution now embraced by Citrix (becoming free again)\ &#8211; Xen has always been \free\. It lived on, post-Citrix&#8217; acquisition of XenSource through the Xen.org guys (to which Citrix continued to contribute). XenServer, the Citrix product, is free today &#8211; as in no cost. The cost is incurred when the option packs and support (known as Essentials) are purchased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
